Google Cloud is taking a significant step into the blockchain space with the development of its own Layer-1 platform, the Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL). Designed specifically for financial institutions, the system is engineered to handle tokenized assets, settlements, and smart contracts powered by Python.
The initiative, which is currently operating on a private testnet, was first revealed in a joint pilot with CME Group in March. The two companies had announced plans to trial tokenization and wholesale payments on a distributed ledger but didn’t explicitly call it a Layer-1 blockchain at the time.
Rich Widmann, Google Cloud’s global head of strategy for Web3, officially confirmed the platform’s status in a LinkedIn post on Tuesday.
Widmann described GCUL as a “neutral” infrastructure layer, positioning it differently from similar initiatives by other major companies. For example, Stripe is building an Ethereum-compatible chain called Tempo for high-performance payments, while Circle is developing Arc to expand the utility of its USDC stablecoin.
In contrast, Widmann said Google’s goal is for GCUL to serve as a shared, common base for a variety of financial institutions rather than a proprietary, vertically integrated product. He noted that competitors like Tether wouldn’t use Circle’s chain, and payment processors like Adyen would likely avoid Stripe’s. By creating a neutral platform, Google aims to allow any financial institution to build and transact without being tied to a single corporate ecosystem.
This move marks a shift for Google, which has previously focused on providing infrastructure and hosting services for existing public blockchains like Solana. With GCUL, the company is moving beyond hosting and into the development of its own protocol.
The project’s nature as a ledger built and operated by a single technology company has raised questions among some observers about its claims of neutrality and decentralization. Users on social media platform X have pointed out that a centralized corporate entity running a blockchain could pose a challenge to the decentralized ethos of the technology.
